The End Is Just The Beginning

by:

Joe Patti

Saturday was the end of our season for all intents and purposes. We have a couple inhouse events and scads of rentals, but the days of meeting people at the airport and seeing them safely to the hotel are over for awhile.

I planned on diving in to final grant reports and catching up on paperwork pushed aside when the office manager broke her hip. Amidst doing all that though I ended up in conversations planning for next year.

The last two days have been, despite my earlier intentions, a series of discussions about the next season. I have been in contact with the new development person stating my desire to form a unified plan for fundraising over the year to be reflected in speeches and publications.

I suggested that next month’s meeting of my booking consortium include proposals of performers for the next two years in preparation for the state foundation’s biennium grant proposal process.

I got into a long conversation with the assistant theatre manager enjoining her to think how we can improve customer service, volunteerism, our publications and website. We have made some good progress in customer service, but given people’s expectations, we have some areas of improvement.

I also discussed how I envisioned how the integration of information sources we have been slowly effecting in our database will hopefully serve to increase our attendance next season (and therefore, is what we needed to work on the next few months.)

As I have gone through the last two days, all the memories of all the small corrective actions I took over the past year came back to me. They were accompanied by recollections of all the mental notes I made to formulate policies to turn the small actions and comments into documented instructions for practices.

One thing I gotta solve and maybe some of the readers can help with some advice. One of the recurring events that I think I need to address is that people often call, hear we charge $2 handling fee on advance sales (vs the fees of many names Ticketmaster levies) and say they rather come the night of the performance.

Part of the problem is our performances don’t approach capacity in advance so there is no perceived downside for our audience. If they show up early enough for a general admission show, they can get tickets and good seats.

The fee itself is mainly to cover the credit card charge and to help pay for the clerk who seems to be sitting around doing less and less as time goes on. We can either raise the price across the board so everyone pays for the person covering the advance sales for the dwindling group of folks who want to talk to someone when they order tickets vs. buy them online or we can just cut the ticket office hours to the week before the performance which is when most people who are calling in advance or walking up are contacting us.

The question we need to answer is if it is returning ticket buyer who is purchasing in advance and will we alienate them if we cut our hours back to reflect the period when demand exists. We actually forward the phones to our office and staff them fairly consistently throughout the year until two weeks, and now perhaps one week, prior to a show when the increase in calls becomes too much of an interruption.

To add a complication, if we are only employing a ticket office clerk a week prior to a performance, it becomes more difficult to find someone willing to work so infrequently. I suspect we are simply caught in an awkward transition of technology period where there are just enough people who haven’t adopted a new technology to make discounting the old system unwise from a relationship standpoint, but so few it makes continuing unwise from a financial standpoint.

Took Some Friends To the Orchestra

by:

Joe Patti

I am contributing to Drew McManus’ 2006 Take A Friend To The Orchestra Month . I took some friends yesterday and have been pondering throughout the day. Instead of making an entry today, I will be working on my contribution.

In the meantime, take a gander at today’s contribution by Alex Shapiro which seems to have elicited some good responses.

U2 Fans Can Love Ballet

by:

Joe Patti

Just as a follow up to my Does Bono Like Ballet entry. I did indeed take the plunge and use that approach in my ads (see below) and press releases.

I actually antagonized over that approach in my print ads because someone suggested that it might alienate U2 fans. You can be the judge, of course. I figured since it essentially complimented the fans for their good taste and didn’t automatically assume liking U2 and ballet were mutually exclusive, it wouldn’t raise too many hackles.

Still, I showed the ad around to people and asked their opinion. Most people though it was cool. The most extreme reaction was “What the F@%^?” from a guy who misread the ad, followed by a chuckle and a comment that it was a cool idea.

The guy who suggested the approach might alienate fans said I should run it by the people at the alternative weekly paper since they would be most plugged in. I didn’t actually run it by them, but did send the ad and press release well in advance and waited for a reaction.

Imagine my glee when I saw that they ran with the angle I cooked up in today’s edition. The writer sort of took off with the general ideas I introduced in my press release. Hopefully it will attract the paper’s readership to the show because right now sales are pretty much contained to the ballet audience.

My ad, however, didn’t appear in the paper. The publisher apologized and said it was in the first proof but accidentally got bumped on the second for a free ad. I was somewhat happy at not having to pay for the publicity until I remembered my friend’s suggestion that the staff of the paper would be a good judge of whether the approach was a good one or not. Suddenly I began to wonder if it was an accident after all…

Hmm, my attempt to set this as an image did not work too well. You can now view the ad here

The Great Pretenders

by:

Joe Patti

One of the entertaining activities the artistic director at a job I once held and I used to engage in was reading the solicitation faxes that came in. Some times the entertainment came from imagining the reactions our audience members would have if they ever saw some of these groups on stage. Other times the entertainment came when we saw that someone was trying to pass a group off as an iconic band.

As they say about spam emailing and telemarketing, these agents wouldn’t advertise if it didn’t work. After hearing a story on NPR today, I figured a caveat emptor entry might be a good idea. If you don’t follow the music world closely, you can end up thinking you are buying a performance by legends at bargain prices only to learn that you are getting what you paid for (if not less).

The NPR story was about “truth in music” laws popping up in some states saying people can’t use the name of iconic music groups unless there is an original member in the group. The story mentions The Platters prominently because in addition to some of the original members using the name, the impressario who developed them owns the rights to the name and sold it all over the place to people without any relation to the group at all.

Some groups it is fairly easy to know you aren’t getting the original group. The Glenn Miller Orchestra is one example. It doesn’t take much effort to realize the originals ain’t performing. There is a group performing under the same name in the UK and Germany, but again, it is tough to confuse which group you are about to see.

Other groups it is a little more difficult. For instance, WAR still tours. There were 8 original band members and about 35 other members throughout the years. Currently, keyboardist Lonnie Jordan is the only original member of the band still touring under the WAR name. Under the existing state laws, he is welcome to do so.

The question is, what constitutes an original member? Pete Best was the original drummer for The Beatles for two years, but outside of a Trivial Pursuit game, few would name him as such. Had the band been any less famous, he might have a case for touring with a band called The Beatles under the state laws. (Of course, this also assumes they retained ownership of their songs.)

The biggest impediment to anyone touring under a band name is someone with claim to the name complaining that they are misrepresenting themselves. Ray Manzarek and Robby Krieger, both very identifiable as members of The Doors have been forbidden to tour under The Doors name or even as The Doors of the 21st Century as a result of a suit by the third remaining member, John Densmore.

Ultimately, if you are thinking about presenting a famous act. It might behoove you to check the names of the people who performed on the best albums against the current list to determine just how famous the band remains.