Watch Out Ohio!

by:

Joe Patti

Yesterday marked the last of a series of entries I prepared at the end of March to cover the move to my new job in southern Ohio. After Memorial Day, I will be returning to my regular Monday – Wednesday publishing schedule. Though for many of you, it will seem like a new schedule given that even if I finished an entry at 7 pm Hawaii time, it was already midnight or 1 am the next day on the U.S. East Coast.

Like many of my new colleagues and neighbors, you may ask why the hell I would want to move from Hawaii to rural Ohio. There are some economic and personal reasons, but the local and state arts environment had significant influence on my decision to move.

Even though Cincinnati is a 2 hour drive away, the existence of organizations like ArtsWave and the support for the arts expressed and shown by Mayor Mark Mallory was very influential.

In the last couple years I have written about cooperative efforts of arts organizations in Columbus and mentioned the intriguing seating arrangements and audience relations practices of the Great Lakes Theater and other arts organizations in Cleveland.

The same state of interesting arts relationships permeates even the small town in which I now work. A very dedicated local community board has partnered with the university to present a performing arts season every year. They do a fairly significant portion of the fundraising for the series. I attended a board meeting the week before my official start date and was astonished by the sponsorship report that was given, in large part due to the graciousness and wisdom shown by one of the major sponsors.

Certainly, there are plenty of opportunities to advance the program for me to sink my teeth into and I look forward to it with relish. (Though apparently chili is the condiment of choice for hot dogs around here.)

I also look forward to plugging into the greater arts community throughout the state.

Rejoice Ohio, the state just got a little better now that I am here!

There Are Intangible Rewards

by:

Joe Patti

A few years back, I followed my examining the idea of Quality in Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance with a question that still percolates in my mind. I had wondered if valuing feedback over a specific grade might be a predictor of an inclination toward non-profit work.

I had based my question on the idea floated that there was a single survey question that could predict customer satisfaction.

I had wondered if there was any research career counselors used that might point even tangentially in this direction.

I also wondered if grades and test scores were de-emphasized in schools in favor of feedback, would we see a shift in the national culture of the U.S. that resulted in less political antagonism and fewer banking scandals as the importance of conspicuous evidence of “winning” diminished.

Quality Endures

by:

Joe Patti

If you have ever read Robert Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, you know he engages in an examination of the concept of quality. I wrote a bit about how it applies to the arts a few years ago.

In the post I made the following observation:

We go before legislatures and tell them that they should be concentrating on all the lives that have been changed and not numbers served when choosing to fund the arts. But when we get back to our offices, damned if it ain’t a lot about the numbers, eh?

In his book Pirsig talks about how he decided not to let his students know what grade they got on a paper but instead give extensive feedback about the work they did and how to improve. The students went crazy. The comments on the quality were well and good, but they wanted a quantitative measure of their success.

When you are running an arts organization it is much the same way. You love the comments about how great the show was, but what you really care about are a satisfying number of butts in the seats (or butts passing through the doors if you are a museum/gallery.)

I think we still face the problem that art for art sake doesn’t pay the bills. The numbers, both in attendance and income, drive us just as crazy as Pirsig’s students because it is the easiest thing to evaluate success on.

On the other hand, as I noted, in the absence of grades the A & B students rose to occasion and did better, the C students either improved or hovered in that territory and the D & F sunk. We all know that not all great artists garner the attention, and certainly the monetary compensation, they deserve. But many of them continue producing great art because they are either motivated internally or by the praise they receive.

Professor Longhair and Earl Carroll of the Coasters, both took jobs as janitors when their careers faltered. Both their careers came back to a degree, Carroll for example was the subject of a kids’ book, That’s Our Custodian, and toured with the Coasters on weekends because he seemed to value being around the kids.

“Mr. Carroll told The San Diego Union-Tribune in 1988. “When they found out I was a rock ’n’ roller — I was on the 50th anniversary of the Apollo with Bill Cosby — the kids couldn’t believe it.”

He added: “Now they call me the star of the school.”

What endures in people’s minds about their experiences with the arts often doesn’t include the size of the crowd. Sure I remember attending a U2 concert with thousands of others, but I don’t remember the size of the audience for my first Broadway play (Peter Pan with Sandy Duncan) or the Steppenwolf company’s production of The Grapes of Wrath.

It’s the butts in the seats that make doing the show possible and it is a sad thing that talent often goes unrecognized and labors in obscurity while trendy, flash in the pan products get recognition. It is the quality of the people, both on stage and in the audience, that often makes being in the seat worthwhile and endures in spite of the absence of recognition.

Modulating the Flow

by:

Joe Patti

A few years back I was reflecting on a study that found arts administrators sought online data and learning opportunities that were relevant to the challenges they face. The problem, as you might imagine, is that they didn’t feel there was enough time in the day to sit down and read articles, much less seek them out. They wanted some sort of information delivery system, but didn’t quite know what those tools looked like.

At the time, I had the insight that this was the same challenge many potential audience members faced. People who may not have participated or attended arts events, upon maturing personally and financially, might desire to start becoming involved but don’t know where to learn about doing so.

At the time my suspicion was that whatever delivery system solved the arts administrators’ problem could probably be used to provide information to audiences.

But now, 6-7 years on, I am not sure a solution as arrived for either group. If anything, the situation has become even more difficult due to need to choose from among a greater proliferation of choices. There is far more information flowing from arts bloggers, forum discussion groups and social media sites like Twitter and Facebook. But there are no consolidated, dependable sources of information to tap into. The individual must attempt to curate their own information.

Even though I am judicious in who I follow on Twitter and via my news reader, it is often all I can do to keep up with the flow of information coming to me. If I weren’t motivated both by a desire for professional development and material to blog about, I think I might give up on making a serious effort to stay current.

But your mileage may vary as they say. If anyone has found a method to gain the professional guidance and information they seek and not become overwhelmed by the experience, please share it.

Likewise, if you know of a good resource for audiences seeking orientation about the arts that doesn’t condescend, let me know as well.