Planning 2010-2011

by:

Joe Patti

Had a meeting with my booking consortium today and learned some interesting things.

First of all, in relation to my post on advocating to keep our state arts council staff from being laid off. I was told that during the hearing, it came to light that the decision to lay the staff off came after all a consultation with all the unit heads–except the council’s executive director. Apparently it was felt the arts council was not an important unit and the grant administration could be accomplished by the general state accounting staff. Then it was decided that the grant administration was specialized knowledge the accountants couldn’t handle themselves so the executive director and one assistant should be kept to help the accountants. (So the restoration of two of about 10 people slated for layoffs.)

The final decision has yet to be made. It did occur to me that while we can recite the economic impact of the arts stats in our sleep, there are still people who don’t know the arts contribute to economic activity. The president of our group said he was able to easily point to a recent $10,000 artistic fee payment that yielded $150,000 in additional direct spending independent of any restaurant checks, parking fees and babysitter payments.

Second thing I learned is that with funding so uncertain, especially among universities, a lot of tour decisions are being made much later in the year. Apparently this was a topic of conversation at a recent regional conference. Because we depend so heavily on artists touring the West Coast to keep our prices down, we will have to make our own decisions for the 2010-11 season months later than we usually do because opportunities may never emerge. I am sure since four of our members are associated with universities this will just perpetuate the cycle of postponed decisions.

One of the positive things I noticed during the meeting was people were proposing many more artists I could afford to present. Last year’s cycle seemed to emphasize higher paid acts, but fewer of them. I haven’t quite analyzed how things resolved themselves this year to determine if artists are lowering their fees or if my partners are looking at a greater number of less expensive performers. If the latter is the case, they are either instinctively or intentionally following the Kennedy Center President Michael Kaiser’s advice not to cut programming in tough economic times.

I am personally feeling less anxious than I was at this time last year when I was faced with the proposition of putting together a slate of performances without the benefit of as many partnerships as I had in the past. Of course, it also helped that I walked into the meeting knowing a show I started conversations about two years ago would be opening my season.

Another thing that came up was a desire to have much closer communication between those organizations that aren’t consortium members and those that are. Someone initially proposed Bela Fleck, Zakir Hussain and Edgar Meyers for the coming season unaware that they were playing with the symphony this year. This represents something of a missed opportunity for the symphony since they have played in at least one of our member’s venues before and could have partnered to take the performance there. (Though it ain’t cheap and given the symphony’s recent financial problems, it was probably more prudent to do as they had.)

Having heard how great the concert was, member organizations seem likely to pursue presenting the trio alone. People expressed regrets that the two weeks notice they received in speaking with agents didn’t provide the opportunity participate in the tour this time around. The problem of duplicating another local arts entity’s efforts has been an ongoing one. Any show that doesn’t have an agent or rights holder monitoring it for geographic conflicts, Shakespeare’s shows for example, has the potential of popping up more than once as a local offering. In some areas groups try to get together and alert each other to future plans. But even that arrangement might not be effective if groups need to postpone their final decision making until later.

That said, we all get tons of emails every day alerting us to routing opportunities. It is amazing that there are actually some acts touring whose plans we haven’t heard about.

Continuing Mystery Gets Me Chocolate

by:

Joe Patti

Okay, some updates on recent posts!

I posted about the state furloughing teachers 17 Fridays over the next year. I was happy to see a local theatre immediately jumped on the opportunity to offer a Furlough Fridays program teaching kids about musical theatre. One of the things I liked was that they require you to attend all the classes emphasizing that student commitment to their classes was just as important as commitment to the classes they were missing.

Parents have actually started a movement to pay the teachers themselves on the furlough days. This raises a number of issues about the use of the school facilities, workman’s comp coverage and insurance. It also raises the question about why people are resistant to having their taxes raised a little bit to support the schools for the whole year but okay with paying a lot more to have their children taught on a few days out of the year. Is this going to reveal the gap between the haves and the have nots if parents in more affluent neighborhoods are able to pay to have their kids taught while the schools in poorer neighborhoods stay empty on those days for lack of the same funds?

One of the biggest impediments actually is a decade old ethics rule that prevents teachers from being paid privately to teach their students. The rule was enacted to prevent basic concerns like whether a teacher skimped on the instruction during the day in order to guarantee the need for additional instruction after hours.

The other update I have is to the situation I covered in my entry titled The No Sell Sales Pitch. Recent events, I am afraid, have done nothing but renew my curiosity about the approach being employed by the two dancers who visited in late August. Today I received a package with a 1 lb bar of Trader Joe’s Belgian Bittersweet Chocolate with Almonds, a bag of Trader Joe’s Trek Mix and a tea candle in a blue holder. There was a card thanking me for meeting with them, praising the work we are doing and hoping our paths will cross again. Still no material about their company which I am assured by others does indeed exist.

Maybe they just aren’t that into my theatre.

Advocating Under Pressure

by:

Joe Patti

I received an email at 3:00 pm today “reminding” me that the deadline for submitting a letter of testimony to the state legislature about the possible layoffs of the majority of the state arts foundation staff was due by 5:00 pm. I use the quotes because I was entirely unaware that the hearings were today.

But this is a topic which really concerns me because the governor has sent lay off notices to pretty much everyone at the organization, including the executive director. The only people who were exempted were a clerk and a couple federally funded positions. Without any staff, the state is in danger of losing funding from many sources, including the NEA and federal stimulus funds.

What follows is the letter I managed to throw together in an hour and a half. It certainly isn’t perfect. At the same time, it is more than the notice I received asked for. The letter advised me to throw a couple sentences together because the legislature probably wouldn’t read it and was only interested in the total number of letters received on the subject.

I figured at the very least it would be good practice for advocacy letter writing under pressure to write something with more substance than being requested. I know a couple people intended to focus on the stats and economic benefits of the arts. However I remembered a talk I attended by Jonathan Katz of the National Assembly of State Arts Agencies on the subject of advocating to decision makers. He talked about using concrete examples of how supporting your cause will show them advancing the public good. While I did mention economic value briefly, my main focus was on the arts valuing the history and culture of under served communities.

Aloha,

I am writing out of concern over the proposed staff cuts to the Hawaii State Foundation on Culture and the Arts (SFCA). Though the arts represent a small part of the state’s budget, the impact they have are tremendous. Other testimony you have received speaks to the economic impact the arts have in the state leveraging $35 in ancillary spending for every ticket and entry fee paid. So much of that economic activity starts with the State Foundation on Culture and the Arts. Without a staff to administer it, funding from regional organizations like the Western States Arts Federation, national organizations like the National Endowment for the Arts and federal stimulus funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is in jeopardy. The loss of this funding can mean a loss or diminished private funding from endowments and foundations which require their support be matched.

Losing access to these funding sources will have a very tangible impact on the availability of culture and the arts for the people of Hawaii and will undercut attempts to disseminate Hawaiian culture nationally and internationally. The first thing people entering Leeward Community College Theatre enjoy is the 102 feet wide by 23 feet high mural by Jean Charlot entitled, “The Relation of Man and Nature in Old Hawaii.” It is a gorgeous work of art commissioned and maintained by the SFCA Art in Public Places program. I am pretty rabid about protecting this magnificent, but fragile fresco from potential damage. As the only major performing arts facility on the leeward side of the island, serving the Waianae Coast, Mililani and North Shore area communities, it is only proper that residents have such a beautiful work to remind them of the historical and cultural heritage of the state when they attend events. It is fortunate that the mural benefited from some minor repairs and restoration two years ago thanks to the SFCA.

The performances themselves benefit from the funding administered by the State Foundation on Culture and the Arts. While the university provides a great deal of support, many of the events which the theatre presents depend heavily on the support the SFCA acquires. Leeward Community College Theatre works with partners throughout the state to leverage our combined purchasing power and secure favorable fees for artists to perform. However, it is still very expensive to bring performances to the middle of the Pacific Ocean. Because of our desire to make performances accessible to people living on the Waianae Coast, Mililani and the North Shore, we charge a much lower ticket price than our partners on the other islands. The funding secured through the SFCA combined with a lot of hard work helps us end the year just barely in the black. We are committed to keeping performances affordable for our constituents. The SFCA makes that possible and we acknowledge that in our print materials, our website and in an announcement from the stage before most performances.

We use the SFCA funding to support performances that reflect the lives of the residents of Hawaii, celebrating their culture, history and engendering pride. We have had groups from throughout the Pacific from places like New Zealand, Easter Island, Samoa, Tuvalu and Tokelau.

We certainly haven’t been simply bringing in groups from the outside, but have also been instrumental in promoting Hawaiian culture and raising its profile nationally and internationally.

We presented Halau O Kekuhi’s “Hanau Ka Moku” which celebrated the emergence of the new island, Kama‘ehu, off the southeast of the Big Island of Hawaii. The show toured the state, the Mainland, including a performance at Wolf Trap, the National Park for the Performing Arts.

We also presented Maui’s Halau Pa’u O Hi’iaka’s performance of the life of Kahekili, who nearly unified the islands under his single rule. The performance also toured the state, the Mainland and Germany and has plans for going to Japan.

We brought Honolulu born Keo Woolford in to perform his one person show, “I-land”, a piece about Hawaiian identity that had multiple successful runs in New York and Los Angeles.

Leeward Community College Theatre and Aiea based Tau Dance Theater produced a contemporary opera entirely in Hawaiian in 2006 based on the Naupaka myth which toured the state. In 2011 we will team up again to produce a piece about Hawaiian snow goddess, Poliahu.

Finally, we are working with Honolulu based Monkey Waterfall to create a site specific show about what it means to be a celebrity that will range across the Leeward CC campus.

We have no hesitation when it comes to presenting events that resonate with the lives of the state’s residents because we know the theatre will be packed. People are voracious for these sort of performances.

Many of the events we sponsor have activities that go beyond just an evening’s performance. We have outreach performances for school children from the Waianae Coast, Pearl City, Mililani and North Shore both at our facility and in the schools. There have been workshops and master classes people can take to hone their technique. But the people of O‘ahu have exhibited aloha MANY times with potluck meals both at Leeward CC, in private homes and on the beaches. Visiting artists have been invited to jam sessions in bars where they have been astonished by the technique of slack key and steel guitar masters and left trying to master these new skills.

The people of Hawaii, (and those lucky artists), stand to lose all these opportunities if the State Foundation on Culture and the Arts is made ineffectual by staffing cuts. I urge you to consider all these issues in your deliberations.

Mahalo nui loa,

Joe Patti