Information Wants to Be Free–But The Internet Won’t

by:

Joe Patti

Came across something a little disturbing yesterday. I don’t remember where exactly. It took me awhile to track it down via Google.

According to the Center for Digital Democracy, phone and cable companies are moving to make every action we make on the internet billable. There is also the possibility that competitors and people espousing views they don’t agree with might be marginalized. Apparently all the money I am paying for my connection isn’t enough for them.

My first thought was that this will probably backfire on them the same way trying to restrict file trading hasn’t really been beneficial for record companies. Yes, they control the methods of communication and that is a lot of leverage. But if there is one thing you can depend on American ingenuity for, it is finding away to circumvent the Man. Some college kid or a municipality or a competitor will see a need to be filled by an alternative.

And if people are faced with the choice of spending a Friday night running the meter on their cable modem or spending some of the same money on a live performance, maybe they choose the live performance, eh?

But assuming that the companies are sneaky and gradually introduce fees so that people will come to accept them, this could also represent a threat to arts organizations. It could become more difficult and expensive to promote your shows via email and digital media than it is now. And what happens if the president of the local cable company is on your competitor’s board and decides to curtail your bandwidth and exposure on the internet ever so slightly?

This isn’t something you want to think about, but probably should keep your eyes on.

American Contribution to The Arts

by:

Joe Patti

I have been reading along in Joli Jensen’s Are The Arts Good For Us? I haven’t gotten too far because some tough weeks have made me long for escapist literature rather than material that I need to take notes on.

She is discussing Alexis de Tocqueville’s view of the arts from his famous Democracy in America. She notes that he felt America’s ties to European arts would keep the young democracy from devolving into barbarism until it developed art of its own.

I got to thinking, what uniquely American things as the country contributed? Blues? Jazz? Television? Movies? Rap? One might cringe at the idea of some of these things representing our contributions. Remember though that none of these things are bad in and of themselves. It is just the expressions via these media that have been lacking at times. Just as sometimes, the expressions have been breathtaking.

The idea that it is the expression, not the art form that is good or bad come upon me while listening to NPR on the ride home today. They were profiling Daniel Bernard Roumain, a classically trained violinist (for as much as that term might mean) who refers to his style as “dred violin.” He is a Haitian-American with dreadlocks and a silver nose ring who likes to experiment with all the sounds he can get out of his violin. His compositions are infused with rock, jazz, hip-hop and classical inspirations.

I don’t know much about classical music, but as I listen I get the feeling that there might be some real worth in what he is doing. Some of his work really sounds interesting. He could be contributing something to the whole music scene, regardless of genre.

But what is it about his pop-inspired music that is so compelling that isn’t in the music of Bond with whom I am not really impressed? To me it seems as if he is concentrating on exploring how different musical elements fit together well rather than if it sounds marketable. There is also some real there there.

Which isn’t to say he isn’t concerned about being marketable. The fact that his look is a marketable commodity is discussed in the interview. But so is the fact that his look will only be cool for so long and will only take him so far.

For all the bombast in the image they are trying to create for him and his group, there is a real humility. He wishes his mastery of classical music was better. He is relieved that a sightreading of a piece he composed for the Lark Quartet integrated as well as it did.

While he has plenty to keep him busy with his group and ten commissions lined up, it remains to be seen if his talent and approach are of a quality (and timing) that will have lasting appeal.

Revisiting Recent and Old

by:

Joe Patti

A little revisiting of former topics to check on how things are going.

Back in May I covered the troubled times the Honolulu Symphony was having. I had actually started out exploring what appeared to be an attempt at a new organizational structure. However, that just ended up being a preamble to developing tensions.

Recent reports show the orchestra is starting on the way back. Donations and ticket revenue are up though attendance is down and their is still a $370,000 deficit.

The good news is that this is down from a near $2 million deficit a few years ago. There are new people on their board of directors and the organization is taking steps to improve their service to the community. The symphony is looking at revisiting their pricing structure for the seats.

And they are pursuing that elusive question of how to make the symphony interesting for regular folks.

Which brings us to the second retrospective, the ever popular, “But Do You Really Think It is Good For You” By way of Artsjournal.com is this book review in the Washington Post. What Good Are the Arts? is a book that examines, according to reviewer Michael Dirda “an intensely argued polemic against the intellectually supercilious, the snooty rich and the worship of high culture as a secular religion for the spiritually refined and socially heartless. Anyone seriously interested in the arts should read it.”

Many of the concepts Dirda quotes sound a lot like those suggested by Joli Jensen in “Is Art Good For Us?” Five years ago I probably wouldn’t have thought long upon it, but in days where non-fiction is peppered with fiction and plagiarism, I have to say I found myself wondering if her work (or those she cites) are in his bibliography.

Alas, my life has been busy and I haven’t gotten too far into Jensen’s book. Hope to soon. Keep watching this space 😉

Send Him Your Comments Yearning to Be Free!

by:

Joe Patti

Drew McManus has been hinting about good things in the wind for awhile now and finally let the cat out of the bag.

Drew is going to be doing a research project for Eastman School of Music’s Orchestra Musician Forum and Senior Editor of Special Projects for Polyphonic.org (coming April 2006).

His research project is going to address the issues which American orchestra musicians see as impacting their professional lives. The study will be used not only to improve conditions in orchestras, but also allow training programs to give their students the training and tools to cope with the realities of life as an orchestra musician.

What is really interesting is that the study is even being done at all, though there is clearly a need. I was thinking it was extraordinary that such a project be funded when I read Drew’s observation that:

Most sponsors prefer to direct their funds toward ‘solutions’ regardless if the issues are well defined or not. Directing resources toward identifying issues and developing questions isn’t a very sexy endeavor and this organization deserves a great deal of credit for understanding that without a strong foundation on which to build, any structure you put up may not be very sound.

To make this happen, Drew estimates he needs to interview 1,400 people from 90 orchestras so watch for a survey in the mail! This will probably be the biggest opportunity orchestra musicians have had a chance to speak out en mass since, well, I don’t know when. Unless they are on strike, you don’t see too many queries posed of multiple musicians on most any topic.

Congrats Drew. We will be watching and expecting great insights to emerge!