Elements of Your Business Model That Can Derail Change

by:

Joe Patti

Ruth Hartt made an insightful post on LinkedIn a few weeks ago which caught my attention. She also mirrored it on her own website. She talked about how boards and staffs of arts organizations will recognize that the digital age has lead to a change in business models across dozens of industries–except for arts and culture.

We have watched film developing kiosks in shopping center parking lots have disappeared and how Blockbuster stores were replaced by Netflix DVD mailing service and then streaming. But when it comes to arts and culture organizations, the solutions to challenges are to cut expenses, do more marketing and discount tickets.

This week she went more in depth about how staffs can start to shift the framing of the business model in partnership with their boards.

Ruth provides a step by analysis of the business model most arts and cultural organizations follow and how the different elements can derail efforts to change. I really appreciate how she broke the issues down in this manner because it provided structure and clarity to things I had already been thinking about.

She sums up part of the overarching viewpoint in need of change:

Your value proposition to the public is simple: “You should buy tickets because we make excellent art.”

But excellent art isn’t what most people need right now. What they actually need are the outcomes that art provides. That doesn’t mean excellence doesn’t matter. It means excellence alone is no longer a viable value proposition.

When the digital revolution shifted consumer priorities—when people started seeking wellness, connection, stress relief, community—this value proposition (and thus the entire model) became a liability.

[…]

The model collapses under its own weight because it’s built to protect something—artistic excellence—instead of serving the people you’re trying to reach.

Back in August I came across a video by the Frick Collection in partnership with Steve Martin which serves as a good example of an audience focus. In my blog post, I called out the following language from the beginning of the video:

Consider what you or I might be drawn to…maybe it is a gilded beard, or a velvet sleeve, a trend setter, a love triangle, a mysterious exchange…Maybe what you see reminds you of a friend or a place you’ve been, or a book you’ve read, or a show you’ve binged.

Maybe it jogs a memory or fills you with a sense of delight, desire, power, wonder, bemusement, or calm.

Maybe you need a moment to sit and think and escape. Somewhere peaceful. Somewhere with a view….this is what the Frick collection is for. For slowing down, following your eye, and getting closer to objects of beauty and awe…”

Stimulating MN Arts Impacted By ICE

by:

Joe Patti

Last week, Springboard for the Arts, based in St. Paul, MN posted on LinkedIn about different funds they and others had created and contributed to in order to mitigate the impact of federal immigration enforcement presence in Minnesota.

While some of the funds are intended to provide relief to artists and organizations who had lost sales and other revenue generation opportunities, funding was also available for reinvestment in creative businesses and to cultivate social cohesion in neighborhoods and communities.

Artists Respond: Safety in Neighbors: We’re funding artists to create small, neighborhood-scale projects that make community care intentional and accessible. How would you like to respond to this moment with your community? Share your project idea with us. Applications are open on a rolling basis.

These are the type of programs Springboard seems to excel at. I have mentioned in other posts that we drew some inspiration from their Irrigate initiative to create art installations and experiences around the street construction in our downtown.

The description of this program on their website defines neighborhood-scale a little more granularly.

Artists Respond: Safety in Neighbors activates the local: neighbors, block clubs, apartment buildings, whisper networks, and local businesses, and asks artists to make it easier for neighbors to find resources, solidarity, and each other. Our goal is to support at least 50 projects in Minnesota. Applications will remain open on a rolling basis, learn more and apply to participate.

Who You Think It Is For

by:

Joe Patti

A decade ago when Nina Simon mentioned in a talk she did that not all the programming at a museum was necessarily for everyone, and that is alright, it was an eye opening moment for me. It has had me looking at the way I program experiences a little differently.

An example she used was that of restaurants adding vegetarian or heart healthy options, people don’t decide to stop eating there. (Cracker Barrel being one exception) People aren’t meant to eat everything on the menu.

Seth Godin made a blog post along the same lines. He notes that the way you process feedback often depends on whether a good or experience was created with a particular person in mind.

If the work we made was intended for someone just like this, and they don’t like it, we need to do a better job next time. The criticism will help us understand how to improve.

But if the work we made wasn’t for someone with the hopes, needs and expectations of the person we’re hearing from, we can forgive ourselves (and them) by acknowledging who it’s for and why.

This being said, many times artists discover that those encountering their work invest it with meaning that the artist hadn’t intended. It can be worthwhile being a little flexible in your view about who the work is for. The unanticipated audience may be quite large.

It IS The Little Things That Matter

by:

Joe Patti

Reimagining The Civic Commons (RCC) made a post on Medium about the contribution of even brief passing nods and greetings on the street have in establishing our sense of belonging.

They cite studies that have found that it is the variety of interactions which people have that contribute to a sense of well-being, not just the deeper, long term interactions we have with family and friends. Brief spontaneous smiles and “hey how ya doing” in hallways, offices, classrooms ease loneliness and increase a sense of connection.

My impulse is to think that such interactions provide an additional layer of validation that you are acknowledged by more than just your immediate circle of friends and family.

They cite the importance of public places in facilitating these interactions.

Because parks, trails and libraries are open to everyone, they can create “moments of density,” a time and place where people naturally cross paths and small interactions can unfold. When these spaces invite people to linger, make eye contact, or share a brief exchange, they foster the kind of everyday connection that supports happiness and well-being. While private sector spaces are too often built for speed and efficiency, public spaces — places that can focus on more than just the bottom line — have the unique opportunity to intentionally encourage these moments.

This is something for arts and cultural organizations should consider when looking at the spaces and places in which they offer experiences. It bears observing how people are using the space and reinforcing that in addition to creating opportunities for people to interact.

The RCC piece cites of people high fiving at Portland Timber soccer games after each goal or the act of passing peace at church services as examples of ritual interactions with (near) strangers. But they also mention interior and exterior spaces which allow people to interact to varying degrees.

Gehl identified three broad types of “social infrastructure” that can help communities nurture a full range of connections: Hubs, Havens, and Hangouts. Hubs bring people from different backgrounds together around shared activities; Havens create spaces of belonging for specific groups; and Hangouts support the casual, everyday public life of a city — chats over coffee, park strolls, and neighborly nods. The takeaway is simple: people interact more often when community spaces are designed for many kinds of interaction, across a mix of spaces, sizes, and experiences.

Arts and cultural organizations can create opportunities for all these interactions.

123794 Next