Let Your Creativity Shine!

by:

Joe Patti

Courtesy of our friends at Artsjournal.com is a story on the BBC website about how the 21st may become the century of amateur culture. The article cites how podcasting, blogs and digital photos have really empowered people with the ability to share bits of themselves.

The article heavily quotes Lawrence Lessig who created the Creative Commons, basically a way for content creators to state what portions of their creations they will and won’t allow other people to use.

The content of my blog, for example, has always had a Creative Commons license on it. Click the icon in the lower right column under the calendar and entry listings to view the details of it.

The story makes the move by many media companies to limit the usage of material they control like the last flare of a fire before it burns itself out. Though they concede that big media will always be in a strong position to create and control, amateurs will find themselves in a much better position to influence tastes than they have ever been before.

The BBC itself is digitizing its archives to allow people to remix their sounds and images in order to create something new. There is no mention about what restrictions they place on the use of the material in terms of giving recognition to the creators of the original pieces, but I imagine they won’t be onerous.

Jinxed Myself

by:

Joe Patti

Well in my last entry, I guess I must have been too smug about feeling I had achieved a degree of mastery over my domain after a year. The next day I experienced some of the political garbage I mentioned came home to roost. I try to adhere to the rule that one shouldn’t blog when angry so I pretty much had to stay away from my computer for a couple days. I am still peeved, but can resist editorializing.

Still, so that I am not tempted, I will talk about something other than work.

As a follow up to my previous entries on the Honolulu Symphony, is this KHPR interview with Gideon Toeplitz, the 17-year head of the Pittsburgh Symphony who has been chosen to oversee the transition to new leadership. (The full interview may be available by podcast, contact the host Noe Tanigawa if you are interested.)

Toeplitz is at the symphony as the member of a consulting group that was contracted to help with the transition. Because he has other projects, Toeplitz will only be available 2 weeks out of the month. He feels that the symphony’s problem is that the local audience doesn’t feel classical music is relevant. Like many symphonies, the Honolulu pops program makes money and supports the classical programming.

According to a recent article, Toeplitz is looking to straddle classical and pops by perhaps offering light classical. He notes Arthur Fielder made his name on light classical.

The one comment he made in the interview that I found interesting was a story about the Pittsburgh Symphony international travels. Apparently, when the symphony would tour, businesses would tag along to promote commercial opportunities in Pennsylvania. I don’t know how well it worked, but it seems like an interesting idea and certainly a way for an arts organization to prove its worth to their home community.

My Summer Vacation 2005

by:

Joe Patti

Been a little busy today so I haven’t had an opportunity to read things and form intelligent observations. And, you know, it is summer and I am not as motivated as I might usually be to squeeze the time in.

The staff and I have been keeping generally busy, though we find more opportunities to go out for lunch on Fridays. We have been straightening up the theatre lobby a little. We don’t have a lot of money for improvements, but we are giving the space cleaner looking lines if nothing else.

There is also an ambitious plan to clean the pack-rat technical director’s office and put shelving in. Unfortunately, the technical director isn’t co-operating. He won’t show up in the building so people know what he doesn’t want thrown out. There is a rumor that he had a third daughter who disappeared around the time the pile started to grow in the back of his office. It doesn’t look like she will be found any time soon.

I will have been in this job a year in three weeks and I must say this fall promises to be less stressful. Last year, I wasn’t here a month and I was flying to Spokane for the WAA conference. Heck, I only had a couple days to register for it when I arrived last year.

Now not only am I registered for it, my hotel and flight arrangements have been made.

Also, the website for the new year is nearly complete (as opposed to the marathon session over one weekend last year where I created it from scratch.

I am also happy to say that I will have a new online ticketing system. I spent most of the day learning how to use it and then programming my season in to it. The interface is not only more attractive than the hobbled together storefront I created last year, but will also end up being cheaper to run. (Unfortunately, I still am not integrated into the university ticketing system which would have been great.) If the ticketing thing goes well, I may sing the company’s praises here, but I don’t want to state anything prematurely.

I have also been doing site visits of local hotels to assess which would be good to place my performers in this year. Some hotels haven’t been interested in my business given that the economy is good and tourism just keeps increasing. Others have been happy to show me around and treat me to lunch to boot.

Alas, as a state agency, I also have to go with the lowest bidder. Of the generally decent hotels I have seen, I would love to place people in the second lowest bidding hotel. The difference in price is $20 a night, but the surrounding are a bit nicer than the lowest bidder. Granted, I could change the criteria, but $20/night adds up when you need 17 rooms over 3-4 nights. Suddenly you are talking about giving up major savings.

As much as I like to treat performers well, I need to have enough money left over to treat the next group of performers well too.

Not too much more has happened this summer other than the political garbage every campus has to endure. I don’t know if this gives anyone without experience in presenting theatre any insight into what all has to happen when you have a small staff and big plans, but, you know, like any egomanicial theatre manager I like talking about myself.

In Between Blockbusters

by:

Joe Patti

Courtesy of Artsjournal.com is an article on a topic I have covered before. (And yes, I know I started that entry the same way.)

The Chicago Sun-Times did a story on the benefits and pitfalls for museums presenting blockbuster art shows. While the temporary traveling shows bring in large crowds, more money and help fill out the museum membership, it also creates expectations from the public.

The question became, ‘What’s on at the museum right now?’ Well, what’s on at the museum is the extraordinary works of the permanent collection, which in their totality are better than any that can ever be brought here from someplace else.”

Blockbusters, in Cuno’s view, prepare people to visit the Art Institute in a specific time frame and then vanish until the next big show — which doesn’t allow for the sustained visits over time that are necessary to engage with art in more than a touristic way.

In another part of the article, the director of the Museum of Contemporary Art likens the touring shows to the quick fix one gets from drugs like cocaine or heroine. You feel good immediately after the show, he says, because your attendance numbers are up and you are flush with money. But then the next year, you don’t approach those attendance numbers with your regular exhibit and you go looking for another blockbuster.

Yet the more special shows you do, the more you dilute the value of what you offer every day in the eyes of the community.

Others like Field Museum CEO John Carter feel that the competition for discretionary income and time necessitate making mission subservient to market forces. “You’ve got to build an argument as to why they should come and participate in this experience, and if you’re only offering your permanent collection, there’s no call to action,” McCarter says.

Since my background has been in performing arts where every season offers different shows from the last, I am probably not in a position to speak with any expertise. However, it seems like the mere existence of your facility should be a call to action. Every museum I have been to and returned to has been because it is there. I have never been to a blockbuster show. (But then again, I hate crowds.)

I suspect though that the real impetus behind programming blockbuster shows is the cost of staying open. Just depending on members of the community to return every handful of years probably doesn’t bring in enough money. Museums need blockbuster shows to bring the same people back on a consistent basis every year or every other year.

Another worrisome development for museums is that big corporations like Clear Channel Communications are getting into the business of handling these blockbusters for a cut of the gate. While it reduces the museum’s financial risk, it also means the museums have to hand over control of their building to the corporations.

However, in recognition of the fact that the whole process may not be healthy for the museums in the longrun, some are taking steps to gain control over their ravenous addictions. The director of the Art Institute is

“…going to be a weaning of the museum off of exhibitions of a narrow range of subject matter with all the attendant hype around them,” he says. “Instead, we’re going to have exhibitions of a different kind, attracting fewer people in number, where the emphasis is on the benefits of scholarship and the patron experience over that of financial return.”