Unplanned Use of Space Can Improve The Space

by:

Joe Patti

Fast Company had a piece on how public use of spaces has changed the spaces and art for the better. The bottom line is basically, design spaces to facilitate flexible use and don’t try to re-assert your vision of order to too large a degree.

Author Andrew Zimmerman cites the example of the way people use the Getty Museum’s steps and lawns for picnics, sketching, socializing and reflecting. The original intent was to provide an attractive entry to the facilities but the use of these spaces has resulted in longer visits and positive perceptions of the museum.

NYC’s Chelsea Market is also spotlighted.

….the design at New York City’s iconic Chelsea Market didn’t stay fixed for long. Shop owners regularly shifted displays, reworked lines, and pulled seating in or out depending on the crowd. What started as clearly defined footprints, where one retailer ended and another began, quickly blurred once real people entered the mix. Those small, practical adjustments weren’t part of some grand plan, but they created a truly organic market that could respond to crowd patterns in real time. In many ways, that flexibility is what made it feel authentic and alive, it is another reminder that adaptation can serve the community, the vendors, and the space itself.

Then there is the example of NYC’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority transit stations and Times Square where poetry installations, myriad performances, public art, graffiti, some officially sanctioned, some less so, occur amid the swirl of humanity.

Along with designing spaces for this type of participation, inviting collaboration, and not being too afraid of letting things get a little messy, I appreciated the tip provided by the article related to measuring the success of these efforts.

Measure engagement differently. Metrics tend to prioritize aesthetic loyalty or operational efficiency. But the real signs of success are more often how long people spend in a place, how often they revisit, and how willing the community is to engage spontaneously in them.

Dang It, Grandma’s Parkouring Again

by:

Joe Patti

I always enjoy receiving ArtsMidwest’s newsletters. They often feature great ideas to stea..erm…adapt for use in other communities.

Recently they posted a call for pitches from residents of the Dakotas, Iowa, and Native Nations for short form video.

What does that mean? Film at least 10 short, vertical phone clips of a local art, culture, or community happening, and get paid to help us amplify Midwestern creativity.

We’ll handle the editing, scripting, and posting on our channels. You’ll get credit and $300 for your footage, a short write-up, and a couple of photos.

Their examples of past submissions is where I found some inspiration.

The one that really grabbed me was the photowalks around Cincinnati where people meet once a week to take photos of little moments of life with whatever camera they have. I loved the idea for facilitating community building, getting people to wander different neighborhoods, and cultivating an appreciation for the beauty of every day occurrences It is the sort of exercise that helps people recognize their capacity for creativity..

Just because this one struck my fancy the most doesn’t mean there weren’t other great ideas in the sample they provided. The featured videos of a sculpture garden mini-golf course, art shanties on frozen MN lakes, and little free libraries turned into sidewalk art galleries.

I was surprised to learn that Des Moines, IA has the largest non-profit building with creative workspaces in the US with 180 studios serving 220+ artists.

And I certainly did not expect to see a video about parkour for senior citizens included on the list. But it certainly makes sense as a way to mitigate concerns about falling by help people improve their spatial awareness and comfort with falling and regain their feet. Not to mention the program encourages creative movement.

So if you live in the geographic area they are focusing on, get a proposal in. If you don’t watch the shorts and get inspired.

Siloing Can Restrict Staff Professional Development

by:

Joe Patti

Apparently there is a growing concern in the museum world about the reluctance of younger generations to assume leadership roles given the challenges museum leaders face. This has been something I have seen pop up for at least 15 years for non-profits in general in the course of writing this blog.

On the American Alliance of Museums site, Ariel Waldman, writes a companion piece to research about generational perceptions of leadership roles. Waldman collects some anecdotal responses from colleagues and other Millennial and Gen Z professionals.

Many responses reflect expectations that administrative roles will take them away from enjoyable interactions with visitors and art works. Some that had made the transition found that their practical interactions were valued when it came to discussing changes in policy and procedures and that there was a degree of satisfaction in being able to contribute in that manner.

Waldman makes a number of recommendations about cultivating younger leaders that include supporting them through mentorship and allowing them to gain experience applying their skills on a larger scale or challenge than they might encounter in their current role.

One thing that caught my eye was the discussion of professional development opportunities being siloed by role and/or job title. Waldman notes that often funding is only available to expand skills and knowledge in an employee’s current role. She advocates for earmarking funding to cultivate an employee’s general leadership capacity.

Some people may not see their own leadership potential, so managers having the ability to recommend someone for training may be an opportunity to bolster someone’s confidence and belief in themself.

I often read about the need to break down the silos between departments in arts and cultural organizations so that staff in roles like development, marketing, and front of house are unified in providing a consistent and informed level of service and experience to visitors.

I hadn’t really considered that the siloing can also result in fewer professional development opportunities for the staff in those roles, constricting their opportunities to grow in their careers.

If You’re Bored, You Might Enjoy This Article On Boredom

by:

Joe Patti

Back in January there was an article on Nautilus about boredom and the trend of people trying to endure forced boredom.

There are “Do Nothing Challenges” and “Rawdogging” where people intentionally do nothing. Rawdogging is especially something people try to do on long flights where they won’t watch videos, listen to music, or read.

Except you’re not really deriving much benefit from the practice.

But the Do Nothing challenge and the rawdogging trend suggest a fundamental misunderstanding of how boredom and disconnection work, says James Danckert, a researcher in the Boredom Lab at the University of Waterloo. Boredom is closer to hunger than to holiness, he argues, and forcing it on yourself for hours on end doesn’t by itself have restorative power. Instead, the feeling suggests something about your attention, agency, or meaning is out of alignment.

Danckert goes on to say that people aren’t listening to what boredom is telling them which is to try to find something meaningful to do. He says meaningful doesn’t necessarily refer to curing cancer. It could be tackling an enjoyable challenge like a tough Sodoku puzzle.

He also mentions that some people are actually seeking disconnection when they engage in one of these challenges. He says it is fine and important to veg out and relax, but it shouldn’t take the form of enforced discomfort.

Danckert also addresses what he feels is a myth about the connection between boredom and creativity. He says that boredom driving people to engage and practice a skill is what results in creativity, not just sitting around bored until inspiration strikes.

The creativity idea has been a bit of a bugbear of mine, and a number of my colleagues who do boredom research feel this way, too. I think there’s this great desire in people to want to believe that boredom will somehow make you creative.

[…]

The story I’ve used in the past a lot is from Jimi Hendrix. Somebody sees Jimi Hendrix play for the first time, and is just blown away and corners him backstage and says, “Man, where have you been hiding?” And Hendrix replies, “I’ve been playing the Chitlin’ Circuit, and I was bored shitless

[…]

But the kind of music that was expected in the Chitlin’ Circuit was old and not to Hendrix’s liking. So he did something else and became the guitar virtuoso that we know. But the logic there is all wrong. Boredom didn’t make Hendrix a genius. Practice made Hendrix a genius. Trying to do different things made Hendrix a genius.

If you’re bored, you might find reading the whole article about boredom interesting. It cites a number of studies and findings on boredom, including some Danckert and his colleagues have just about debunked. He cites one about a series of nine experiments where people were asked to sit alone with their thoughts for 15 minutes. In one of the nine, people were allowed to administer electric shocks to themselves.

Quite a number of people who had been shocked prior to the isolation and said it was so uncomfortable they would pay to avoid being shocked again actually shocked themselves rather than sit and do nothing for 15 minutes. One guy shocked himself 196 times in the 15 minute period.

123797 Next