That Old Green Eyed Monster

by:

Joe Patti

I thought I would bring up the topic of jealousy to no particular end other than the fact it exists but no one really talks about it. I am not sure I have any suggested solutions. I just wanted to throw it out there.

The jealousy I am talking about is the type felt by the staff and supporters of the lesser arts organizations toward the local or regional darling. Unless you have worked for the top dog all your life, you know what I am talking about.

Sometimes the envy is just over the choices audiences make-Why do people go to see that shallow tripe rather than attending our shows where we deal with real issues?

Other times it has to do with perception that funding is going to the wrong place–The community rallying around the financially mismanaged behemoth, securing emergency donations from the state, banks and individuals, eliminating the usual annual gifts to you.

The upshot is, you essentially develop an inferiority complex despite all your protestations about how much better your own performances are. It may keep you running lean and mean to stay competitive and thus avoids burdening the community with another mismanaged organization. On the other hand, by constantly defining yourself in relation to another organization, you can place yourself in a box of your own building and ignore opportunities for growth.

I have worked for both the top dog and the underdog. I have even worked for the mismanaged behemoth that was sucking the money out of the community. Even though I didn’t have anything to do with the mismanagement and was working 14-18 hours days to make up for the staff shortage, I felt guilty about the diversion of funding from other orgs.

It is great to be the organization with the most goodwill. It is easier to rebuild goodwill having lost it than it is to generate it from the start. Individuals may defect, but a community on the whole is fairly forgiving.

A lot of it has to do with the physical and social environment the organization is in. About a year ago I cited an Urban Institute study that said there were two factors that would immediately cause a person to decide not to return to your organization again- “not liking the venue and not having an enjoyable social occasion.”

A case in point- There is a newly renovated facility in town. It has new equipment, gold leaf, new marquee…the works. It is essentially a rental house and doesn’t program a balanced season like I do. Since people are pretty much making their entertainment choices at the last minute, the distinction isn’t apparent or important to them.

Everybody likes that place best even though there are a lot of one way streets to navigate and no free parking (and the garage next door fills up quick.) Once you get inside, the surrounding allow you to feel like you are attending an event of note. If you don’t, they have a liquor license so you at least numb yourself to the lack of that feeling.

It is hard not to feel a little jealous or inferior. We once had patrons go there for one of our shows despite the fact we had mailed them tickets two weeks before that clearly had our venue name on them. If the show is any good, it must be happening there is apparently the general feeling.

What really drove the popular sentiment about that theatre home to us was an article written a month ago about the world premiere show we did this past weekend. Two days in a row, in the Thursday newspaper and in the Friday Fall Arts Review, a columnist wrote that the show would premiere at my theatre in rough form and then a refined, more formal performance would be at this other theatre.

What lead him to write that? Well the company performing the show was thinking about renting this other theatre to do school outreach performances. They asked the facility to hold the date. The facility put it up on their website calendar, but because it was tentative, there was no time or prices listed and the description actually listed outreach activities. The company ultimately decided not to do the performance, canceled the date and the web listing came down 7-10 days after it went up.

The artistic director of the dance company theorized that people couldn’t imagine why anyone would want to premiere a show in my venue and rationalized the details from the scant evidence available.

In the end, since I sold out, the stories had no negative impact on me. There may be some who decided they would wait for the show to appear at the other theater who are going to be disappointed or confused when they show up since someone else has rented that date.

I really don’t think I am so much in competition with shows at the theatre as I am with the general perception and aura of prestige that surrounds it. Little by little I am trying to create an identity for us and carve out our little niche. While there are a lot of people who think the 8 mile drive to my place is WAAAAY out in the hinterlands, there are people who live even further out who think the 8 mile drive to my general neighborhood is civilization. There are fewer of them, but they deserve to be served too.

Mostly, I want to concentrate on keeping nimble and out of a box of my own construction. I don’t have a lot of advice about constructively dealing with envy to offer, but avoiding self-constraint seems like some small wisdom.

Little Horn Tooting

by:

Joe Patti

Okay, I am just going to toot my horn a little here, as under deserving as I might be. On the other hand, I would be a little hypocritical to talk about how theatres should blog about their activities and not mention some of my own.

This past weekend we held the world premiere of the contemporary opera I had mentioned earlier. I was pleased to have generated so much buzz about the show it was sold out before the time the entertainment section stories and public radio story came out on Friday. The woman doing the public radio story called me the day before it aired asking how I suggested she close the story given the fact we were already sold out.

Fortunately, the work is playing in two other cities in the state and plane tickets are super cheap due to a fare war because we were fielding a heck of a lot of calls on Friday and Saturday.

Now that my performance is over, I have no financial interest in the show or any interests at all other than the compulsory playbill listing of my facility as the development and world premiere location.

Out of pride though, I do want to promote it a little bit more to the world in general. The company is looking for a US tour and a Japan tour. Japan is wild to consume Hawaiian culture and I am noticing more and more Hawaiian cultural performances showing up in season brochures.

I would also like to promote the show for the simple reason that it will help a local artist remain a viable employer of local performers. As I noted months ago, the state essentially exports its artistic talent for lack of opportunities.

So, if you are looking for an interesting contemporary cultural piece and would like to learn more about Naupaka: A Hawaiian Love Story, here are a few links to the stories-

Honolulu Star Bulletin, Honolulu Advertiser (has video footage from rehearsal), Hawaii Public Radio broadcast.

And you can always contact me as well. After the stories get put into the archives, I imagine I will be one of the only sources of additional information along with Tau Dance Theater.

Dancing History Professor

by:

Joe Patti

From the Chronicle of Higher Education, Professor Kerry Sopher at Brigham Young University comes clean about his love for ballet and how he employs it in his lectures. This self-taught dancer uses ballet moves to illustrate diplomatic relations throughout history.

“…the glaring flaws of Roosevelt’s New Deal policies dissected with the help of a series of deftly executed entrechats…a re-creation of the tension surrounding the Bay of Pigs crisis by remaining en pointe for as long as possible (20 seconds on a good day!)… To the strains of Stravinsky’s joyfully martial Rite of Spring, I performed an athletic, 15-minute-long, tightly choreographed celebration of the war on terrorism…I found this performance to be so emotionally and physically exhausting that I was forced to end the class 30 minutes early, right there on that high note.”

It is an interesting story in its own right and an a fairly novel approach to integrating the arts into other subjects. I have never been a real big fan of interpretive dance, but I have to admit that the moves he applies to the various historical occurrences seem appropriate. (Especially his pas de deux with a nervous student to illustrate Anwar el-Sadat’s suspicions of Menachem Begin.)

I also have to empathize with him over his mortification at being snickered at the first time he used dance to illustrate his point in class. To have had the guts to do it in the first place, much less to screw his courage to continue after the laughter from the back of the room is commendable.

I actually went to Ratemyprofessor.com to check him out and see if any students had any comments about the dancing. From the ratings you can’t tell he is anything but a real good teacher. That is probably as it should be. His use of dance is as a illustrative tool to help students learn and not some out of context indulgence or eccentricity.

Those Musical Sixties

by:

Joe Patti

A little bit of incredulous griping today.

With all the discussions and advice we get about keeping our organizations relevant in our communities, refining our marketing approaches to be more efficient and using technology to meet the expectations of our customers, I often wonder if Tams Witmark Music Library either doesn’t get it or is just complacent from their success.

The company administers the rights to some of the biggest classics in musical theatre. They send out a catalog every year and I am amazed at how unappealing it makes their shows look. Most of the photos are from the original Broadway productions back in the 1960s and 70s.

Yes, it is nice to see what Julie Andrews looked like in her late 20s when she was in Camelot. But the dated costumes and hairstyles just scream “this is staid show with nothing to offer your audiences in 2006” every time I get the catalogue in the mail. I have seen and been a part of these shows and it makes me cringe when I think that people will be turned off from producing them because of these godawful pictures.

The only saving grace I see is that they don’t have these awful pictures on the website. (There are almost no pictures at all.) So between Broadway revivals and seeing/participating in productions, people will have a positive enough impression of the shows that they don’t need images to help them make a choice when they visit the website.

I am sure the catalog works for the company just fine but I wonder if business might increase if they solicited images from even good amateur productions with which to update their catalog.

One thing that is depressing is that the catalog is that by putting in pictures of the original casts, the publication bears witness to the fact that there have been so few great original musicals produced in the last few decades.