This is the second part of an essay by Jack Allen, who just became president of KBPS-FM in Portland, Ore., in which he considers the future of classical public radio. Part one ran on Wednesday. Let us know what you think, and enjoy.
The Future of Classical Public Radio
Copyright 2008 — Jack Allen
Challenges
Will Rogers said it a long time ago: “Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.”
We have a sense that just because Mozart’s music is coming out of speakers every day, like it has for 40 years, we must be doing it right.
The business organization consultant Michael Hummer once remarked, “One thing that tells me a company is in trouble is when they tell me how good they were in the past. When memories exceed dreams, the end is near. The hallmark of a truly successful organization is the willingness to abandon what made it successful and start fresh.”
Our history in public radio pretty much included a guarantee of financial support from our government and license holders (as opposed to listener-sensitive revenue such as underwriting and donations), which in turn created a sense of entitlement and bred a kind of complacency. Our history also includes legacy ideas about programming. There’s usually a legacy sound as well. This is quite a bit to overcome. If we sound stuck, we probably are. Over the past 40 years, if a classical music station did rely primarily on listener support, without true regard for the listener, life at these stations was usually a half-step up from bare subsistence.